overview for tttigre
canada goose outlet 80 off i don believe that inherently calling an item tasteless is problematic. there plenty of stuff out there that i think we could all agree is in terrible taste, like t shirts with offensive/racist slogans on them or whatever. that said, i find a good canada goose outlet online bit of the arguments that bring up some universal idea of taste as having roots in something classist or racist. like what mentioned in the original post people who point out that the items splashed in logos and visible branding are while they also tend to be canada goose outlet jackets on the cheaper end of the spectrum and canada goose outlet uk sale thus the much more expensive, unbranded items are the ones. i think there is an implication there that if you poor you can only get the tacky stuff, canada goose outlet sale whereas if you are wealthy and able to canada goose outlet canada afford more you can yourself some nice taste in general is a pretty elite privilege. it is only canada goose outlet reviews when goose outlet canada you are able to afford a higher echelon of choice that you can really develop taste. there nothing wrong with this (i too enjoy the taste of things that i can afford to choose) but what is potentially problematic is judging others who cannot afford to develop that taste against your developed (or more realistically, afforded) taste. greater societal norms of taste across all aesthetics and arts have been by and large dictated by the cultural elite (european or american white male) and so i see looking down on something as being tasteless being a somewhat similar dynamic canada goose factory outlet as calling people from different ethnic groups so they don fit into canada goose outlet in usa your picture of society that doesn mean it uniformly bad. there are power dynamics at play, and while no case will ever be black and white, i do believe it worth thinking about. canada goose outlet 80 off
canada goose jacket outlet sale again, i refer to the original post. canada goose jacket outlet sale
canada goose outlet online uk It seems to rely on an idea that people buying $10k purses inherently have more “taste” than those buying $400 purses (problematic, classist). It seems canada goose outlet parka to assume that splashy logos are inherently tacky (questionable, classist?). It also seems to suggest that people who can spend $10k on a purse are automatically more secure in their status than people who can spend $400 (questionable, classist, problematic). canada goose outlet online uk
canada goose outlet las vegas i arguing against considering certain items inherently tasteless. thinking someone is dressed in an aesthetically ugly way (and even considering that taste is different from considering something like a shirt with a logo on it to be inherently tasteless. other posters seemed to take that to mean you can criticize anything, which is objectively untrue. canada goose outlet las vegas
canada goose outlet online store sure, i have no problem calling out aesthetic ugliness. i think that is a different issue than calling out taste. see excerpt from another comment chain in this thread: canada goose outlet online store
canada goose outlet price we can argue aesthetics here all day long maybe the supreme logo just doesn look good in someone opinion, and that fine but in my view, the popular use of words like and to describe certain brands is not an aesthetic judgement but a social one, and that is pretty gross. canada goose outlet price
canada goose outlet us they definitely get conflated a lot, but i not saying you can think something is ugly. like you said, you can identify purpose and intent and still think it is ugly. that is fine; i think nothing is wrong with recognizing that something doesn align with your own personal taste. my point is that when you start to create platitudes of taste about something aesthetic, you throw yourself into a jungle of bad assumptions. canada goose outlet us
canada goose outlet nyc who defines that sense of taste chances are, if it https://www.gooseyou.com like most aestheticized things, it a group that has historically been in a position of power. they can have their sense of taste, which is fine, but to look at another group and call their display bad taste is enforcing a classist hierarchy that the receiver of judgement might not even want to be a part canada goose outlet of anyway (see: anyone who has argued hop isn music not saying you can hold opinions of things yourself, or even as a group. i saying taking those opinions and creating a catch all judgement of taste on anything (which is what the original post is about) is putting yourself on a canada goose jacket outlet troubling pedestal. canada goose outlet nyc
canada goose outlet vancouver i liked an argument i heard once canada goose outlet uk about margiela branding, aka the famous four stitches. a lot of people have viewed that as “the absence of branding”, a statement from margiela anti individual/anti marketing ideology, further reinforced by their early season blank label. but in actuality, those canada goose outlet shop four stitches are just as much of a social signifier as a supreme logo hoodie or a gucci belt (or, frankly, an abercrombie fitch tee from 2006.) these things are all signaling the wearer position inside of a certain group. to uphold any as being or tasteful than any other is ignoring the fact that official canada goose outlet they are, at the end of the day, all the same thing. we can argue aesthetics here all day long maybe the supreme logo just doesn look good in someone opinion, and that fine but in my view, the popular use of words like and to describe certain brands is not an aesthetic judgement but canada goose outlet a social one, and that is pretty gross canada goose outlet vancouver.